Justifying Critical Illness Benefit Plans
Benefit plans such as cancer insurance or critical illness insurance can sometimes be hard to justify. Critics argue that limited benefit policies are too niche, and cover only a section of what a more expansive plan would cover.
Forum members came to the defense of limited benefit plans, noting that 1 out of 2 men and 1 out of 3 women will contract cancer during his or her lifetime. Many of these cancers will be serious, and the public outside of the insurance community is well aware of the havoc that can be wreaked on a family paying for long-term illness treatments.
One agent shared, “Within two weeks of being diagnosed [my father] was no longer working. His 50k cancer policy kept him and my mother from losing the house and everything he had worked a lifetime for. That 50k was equal to his annual salary. When he died the life insurance kicked in.”
Other agents disagreed with the idea that critical illness benefit plans should be pursued, noting that more expansive, carefully-chosen health insurance policies would generally cover cancer and long-term illness.
- Small businesses big winner with reinstatement of Health Reimbursement Arrangements
- Insuretech startups Hippo, Lemonade on the attack against agents who sell homeowners coverage in California
- 4 industry trends to watch for in 2017
- Shopping up, enrollment channels shift for Medicare Part D as more consumers rely on brokers
- Why companies can’t get marketing right
- Optimism rebounding among independent P&C agencies; leads to aggressive growth plans in 2017
- Lessons from the U.K.’s bold new retirement initiatives
- Annual review of client needs only makes sense