Justifying Critical Illness Benefit Plans
Benefit plans such as cancer insurance or critical illness insurance can sometimes be hard to justify. Critics argue that limited benefit policies are too niche, and cover only a section of what a more expansive plan would cover.
Forum members came to the defense of limited benefit plans, noting that 1 out of 2 men and 1 out of 3 women will contract cancer during his or her lifetime. Many of these cancers will be serious, and the public outside of the insurance community is well aware of the havoc that can be wreaked on a family paying for long-term illness treatments.
One agent shared, “Within two weeks of being diagnosed [my father] was no longer working. His 50k cancer policy kept him and my mother from losing the house and everything he had worked a lifetime for. That 50k was equal to his annual salary. When he died the life insurance kicked in.”
Other agents disagreed with the idea that critical illness benefit plans should be pursued, noting that more expansive, carefully-chosen health insurance policies would generally cover cancer and long-term illness.
- Agents Behaving Badly Part II
- The ‘no sale’ signals: Why prospects won’t buy from you
- Industry trade media brands disappearing: A closer look
- InsureTech news: Slice testing rideshare app; Lifester to match consumers, agents; Decisely gets $60M boost; Lemonade expands to Illinois
- Millennial misconceptions of life insurance: a barrier to life ownership
- 4 tips for finding a career mentor
- AALU, GAMA launch partnership to unify advocacy efforts for appropriate tax treatment of life insurance
- New York fines Zenefits $1.2 million for unlicensed insurance sales