Justifying Critical Illness Benefit Plans
Benefit plans such as cancer insurance or critical illness insurance can sometimes be hard to justify. Critics argue that limited benefit policies are too niche, and cover only a section of what a more expansive plan would cover.
Forum members came to the defense of limited benefit plans, noting that 1 out of 2 men and 1 out of 3 women will contract cancer during his or her lifetime. Many of these cancers will be serious, and the public outside of the insurance community is well aware of the havoc that can be wreaked on a family paying for long-term illness treatments.
One agent shared, “Within two weeks of being diagnosed [my father] was no longer working. His 50k cancer policy kept him and my mother from losing the house and everything he had worked a lifetime for. That 50k was equal to his annual salary. When he died the life insurance kicked in.”
Other agents disagreed with the idea that critical illness benefit plans should be pursued, noting that more expansive, carefully-chosen health insurance policies would generally cover cancer and long-term illness.
- Political reaction: Republicans propose The American Health Care Act
- State Farm reports $1.2 billion pre-tax operating loss in 2016
- DOL aims for initial 60-day delay in fiduciary rule effective date
- Report aims to put a stop to ‘Use It and Lose It’ homeowner policies
- Most LTCI claims begin and end at home; insurers pay out $8.65 billion in 2016 claims, new data confirms
- 2nd annual ‘Insurance Careers Month’ trumpets fact 93% are proud to work in the industry; rallies recruiting efforts
- MetLife annuity and life products officially rebranded under Brighthouse Financial name
- 2017 health insurance trends: HSAs, wellness incentives and other tactics employers looking at to reduce costs