Full disclosure and ethical leadership: A self-imposed standard of excellence for the insurance industry
Full disclosure should be a requirement for the insurance industry. Insurers and their respective agents should volunteer critical information to current and prospective clients.
While the law does not demand that agents reveal their commission structures, while it does not mandate that clients know about the bonuses agents may receive for selling a particular policy and the orders imposed by one's bosses to do so, the public should nonetheless be aware of these things.
We, as agents and industry professionals, need to pull back the curtain on actions that most people do not know exist – and directives that these same individuals would want us to report, or to cease doing.
In this spirit of full disclosure, allow me to follow my own advice. Permit me the chance to explain why full disclosure – of everything – strengthens people's collective perception of the insurance industry.
If clients understand how our profession works – if, in the process of recommending that a client buy a specific policy, an agent also states that he or she is eligible (from the sale of this policy alone) for perks like a Caribbean cruise or a month-end raise – then whether that individual purchases or rejects a policy, there can be no confusion about process.
Put a different way, honesty is, indeed, the best (insurance) policy; it clarifies how an agent operates, and relieves the otherwise hidden pressures to sell something at all costs, no matter the expense to clients.
As the founder of Local Life Agents, I have the freedom to make these disclosures. I am not a captive agent, bound by one (and only one) insurer's suite of services.
Most importantly, I do not have a quota to fill, an internal decree to obey or any concealed agenda regarding the promotion of, in my expert opinion, inferior policies.
Do I, therefore, expect captive agents (of which I was once one) to tell clients the complete truth? Sadly the answer is "No."
But there is a larger point, one that will compel insurers to do something they have the liberty to perform without any kind of coercion: Tell clients what you, as an agent, get for pushing a certain product.
Tell them not just what you receive, so they can judge your concessions against the merits (and price) of the policy you choose to advance, but also tell them when – and why – you may not have anything that suits their needs.
I can already sense the outrage – by insurers and agents alike – against this idea, and the effort to maintain a culture of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." You have the false hope, on the one hand, that clients will never inquire about conflicts of interest and kickbacks, and the code of silence by insurers to disclose nothing, on the other.
The reason this system is neither fair nor sustainable is simple: The public is, after the 2008 financial meltdown and the ongoing malaise of the Great Recession, cynical about how insurance companies and financial institutions operate.
- Editor’s Note: This is a contributed op-ed piece from independent insurance agent Brad Cummins. To share your thoughts on commission disclosure or to comment on this article, please visit this new thread.
Continued on next page
- Small businesses big winner with reinstatement of Health Reimbursement Arrangements
- Insuretech startups Hippo, Lemonade on the attack against agents who sell homeowners coverage in California
- 4 industry trends to watch for in 2017
- Shopping up, enrollment channels shift for Medicare Part D as more consumers rely on brokers
- Why companies can’t get marketing right
- Optimism rebounding among independent P&C agencies; leads to aggressive growth plans in 2017
- Lessons from the U.K.’s bold new retirement initiatives
- Annual review of client needs only makes sense