10 ways to protect your business from Internet vigilantes
Facebook teems with people angry about their bad restaurant meals or a fellow citizen’s sloppy driving. Before the advent of social media, they may have simply left a penny for a tip or shaken their fist at the errant driver. Today, however, they dump their anger directly onto the Internet. Lucky us!
Welcome to the strange new world of online shaming… where no misdeed goes unpunished, forgiveness is a dirty word, and measured response is an antiquated concept. And it’s a world that can be especially dangerous to financial advisors whose mistakes, imagined or real, can motivate clients to wage online vendettas.
What exactly is this phenomenon? According to Wikipedia, online shaming is defined as “a form of Internet vigilantism in which offenders are publicly humiliated using social and new media. Proponents of shaming see it as a form of online participation that allows hacktivists and cyber-dissidents to right injustices. Critics see it as a tool that encourages online mobs to destroy the reputation and careers of people who made perceived slights.”
Internet shaming became popular when people began spreading nasty comments about “annoying” celebrities such as Anne Hathaway and Justin Bieber. But the practice spread to ordinary citizens behaving badly. But unlike denigrating celebrities who continue to live charmed lives, shaming ordinary people can be devastating. It can lead to them getting fired, depressed, or even suicidal. And thanks to Google, the Internet establishes an indelible record of their suffering.
How bad can Internet shaming get? Just ask Walter Palmer, the Minnesota dentist who killed the famous Zimbabwean lion named Cecil. Shortly after his lion photo went viral, Palmer’s dental practice receive 8,000 negative “reviews” on Yelp.com. People sent him death threats, mobbed his website, and even threatened to destroy his dental office. Someone even initiated a Change.org petition demanding that he be extradited to Africa to stand trial. Not surprisingly, Palmer went into hiding, putting his dental hygienist and other employees on the street.
And what about Memories Pizza, whose proprietor announced it would no longer cater gay weddings? Internet vigilantes exploded in fury at the restaurant’s perceived bigoty. But that paled compared to its revulsion at Martin Shkreli, the hedge-fund investor who raised the price of a generic drug for AIDS and cancer patients from $13.50 a pill to $750 – an overnight increase of 5,500%, turning himself into perhaps the Internet’s most hated person.
One thing we’ve learned from these events is that the public is quick to take offense and slow to forgive. We’ve also learned that their thought process is pure black-and-white. For example, the fact that Dr. Palmer may not have been personally responsible for luring Cecil away from his protected enclave did not prevent people from piling on after they saw the lion photo.
• See also: Avoiding a reputation mud bath
Furthermore, we’ve discovered that people crave punishments that are more severe than the original offense. When charity worker Lindsey Stone posted a tongue-in-cheek photo of herself shouting and making an obscene gesture in front of a “Silence and Respect” sign at Arlington National Cemetery, it sparked a furious shame storm. Some people called for her to be jailed; others howled for her to be raped or killed. By the evening of the first day, a “Fire Lindsey Stone” Facebook page had received 12,000 likes. Soon, she lost her job caring for adults with learning disabilities, and for the next year, she suffered from PTSD, depression, and insomnia, rarely leaving her house. Did posting an inappropriate photo online deserve such savage retribution?
Perhaps most troubling is that Internet vigilantes don’t draw a distinction between private behavior and professional responsibility. For example, Dr. Palmer was hounded for something he did while on vacation in Africa, not for an error he made as a dentist. Today, people apparently believe a service provider should be morally upstanding in every respect to deserve their patronage. A single questionable act or statement, and the relationship is history.
How should financial advisors handle this phenomenon? Here are 10 strategies that might help:
1. Recognize that it’s only a matter of time before a client rages about you online. Can you see it now? “Worst financial advisor ever; promised me a six percent return on my annuity but I’m only getting two percent.” Or “my financial advisor is a bum; he got me into a mutual fund that’s failing to beat its benchmark index. What a jerk!” When it comes to financial advisors getting shamed online, it’s not a question of “if,” but “when.” Steel yourself emotionally for future attacks.
2. Take a defensive approach. For example, during your on-boarding process, be sure to explain your commitment to high-quality service. Encourage all new clients to share their problems and concerns with you personally rather than taking their issues online. This will assure that problems get resolved promptly without excess drama.
Next page: Strategies 3-10
- Coverage for life ... provided you don't live past 100
- Pacific Life takeover of former Genworth Lynchburg life operation helps stabilize the term market
- When technology enables sleazy marketing practices
- For first time ever, more Americans covered by employment-based life insurance than by individual
- Need for coverage on display in the stories of 2017 Life Lessons Scholarship award recipients
- MDRT appoints Pittman as its 92nd President; New York Life continues to dominate U.S. membership
- Less than half of employed Americans have workplace group life coverage
- 3 business benefits a flexible underwriter can deliver